In an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Galadima said that although the President has taken hard decisions for the good of the country, the matter of subsidy removal could have been handled in a more efficient way. He said, “He took hard decisions, removed the oil subsidy. But if I were him, I would have done it differently…I could have enquired on even how and why this subsidy kept on accumulating in quotas to this level where we are. That is the difference.
“And part of it would have been that, if I were an adviser to Mr. President, I would have advised for him to take some measures such that the removal will not be painful. The removal will not have far reaching effects on the social life of the country, especially the ordinary man.”
